SuperTokens is an open source authentication solution offering features like: Different types of login: Email / password, Passwordless (OTP or Magic link based).

SuperTokens.com

How can I get the session in vuejs .... the router load before the package and the init function

hey <@943802553504772096> you can do supertokens init ont he global level

```ts
SuperTokens.init({
  appInfo: {
    appName: "formelegal",
    apiDomain: env.VUE_APP_BASE_URL,
    apiBasePath: "/auth",
  },
  recipeList: [
    Session.init({
      tokenTransferMethod: "cookie",
    }),
    ThirdPartyEmailPassword.init(),
    EmailPassword.init(),
  ],
});

```

I can access to session just in the router it's false when I do doesSessionExist , but i can call my api

whats the value of env.VUE_APP_BASE_URL? And what API are you querying when calling sign in?

```ts
import { signIn } from "supertokens-web-js/recipe/emailpassword";

```

whats the cookie store on the frontend? Can you send a screenshot?


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1097797954263322726/1097801417550479441/Screenshot_20230418_103046.png

whats the cookie values in applications tab?


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1097797954263322726/1097803240474681384/Screenshot_20230418_103800.png

can you fire just one message when you have a problem .... it fire in loop

can you please clearly explain what the issue is? I'm unable to understand most things you are saying. Consider using a translator please.

I cannot limitate part of the app in vuejs

I need to set ser can access everyting at /auth other they cannot access

and i cannot access to session.doesSessionxist return me false every time I try ( because it loads to early )

where are you calling session.doesSessionExist?


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1097797954263322726/1097816193081024522/Screenshot_20230418_112929.png

it tell me when I try to login => may exist ???
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1097797954263322726/1097817256953651232/localhost-1681810409254.log

are you calling doesSessionExist without using `await` in front of it?

i see that happening in the screenshot though..

if you can produce a simple code example on top of our demo apps that can reproduce this issue, then we can have a look