Hey <@498057949541826571> for older version of su...
# support-questions-legacya
alen_george
12/18/2023, 10:52 AMHey @rp_st for older version of supertoken node - 12.x.x , do we have multitenancy as the recipe ?
const Multitenancy = require("supertokens-node/recipe/multitenancy"); I couldn't find this file. Its throwing an error.
r
rp_st
12/18/2023, 11:02 AMhey @alen_george we don't. You will have to update to newer versions.
rp_st
12/18/2023, 11:02 AMYou can see our changelog in the node and frontend repo for steps to upgrade.
a
alen_george
12/18/2023, 11:05 AMCan we use the curl method directly just to test it without upgrading ?
I was following this to create a new tenant :
On making a request it says , not found.
r
rp_st
12/18/2023, 11:05 AMYou can. Sure. However, the full integration will not work without updating the backend SDK.
rp_st
12/18/2023, 11:06 AMYou may also need to update the core (i don't know the version you are using right now), but for that, you can email us from your registered email ID
a
alen_george
12/18/2023, 11:07 AMI did a make cURL call, using Postman, it returns not found.
We are using these versions right now.
"supertokens-node": "^12.1.1"
"supertokens-web-js": "^0.3.0",
r
rp_st
12/18/2023, 11:07 AMwhat version of the core are you running?
a
alen_george
12/18/2023, 11:08 AMDevelopment Environment (v4.1) IS this the one ? Where can I find it ?
r
rp_st
12/18/2023, 11:08 AMyea
rp_st
12/18/2023, 11:08 AMu will need to update this
rp_st
12/18/2023, 11:08 AMyou can email us on rishabh@supertokens.com for the update from your registered emial id
a
alen_george
12/18/2023, 11:09 AMSure, I will do that.
alen_george
12/18/2023, 11:22 AMHey we have dropped a mail as requested.
alen_george
12/19/2023, 5:43 AMHi @rp_st Did you guys upgrade the core ?
r
rp_st
12/19/2023, 5:43 AMwe will do it today
rp_st
12/19/2023, 5:43 AMfor the dev env
a
alen_george
12/19/2023, 5:44 AMAnd for the prod, how are we supposed to do ?
r
rp_st
12/19/2023, 6:02 AMsame process. But i would first recommend that you finish the whole setup in dev, and then we can update prod
a
alen_george
12/19/2023, 6:18 AMsure will do that. Why is the core not automatically updated ? Will we have to do it every time ? Also if possible can you please try to quickly update the dev env.
r
rp_st
12/19/2023, 9:03 AMHey @alen_george We have upated your dev env.
rp_st
12/19/2023, 9:04 AMcore updates are not automatic. Each time you want to upgrade the core for an envorinemtn, you will have to email us.
That being said, we are working on making it automatic via a button on the dashboard, but the timeline for that is unkonwn
a
alen_george
12/19/2023, 9:08 AMThanks for the update, we have observed that the current core version is 5.0 and I have updated the packages for backend and frontend to the latest one's. We are getting an error while making calls which says 'Error: The running SuperTokens core version is not compatible with this NodeJS SDK.' .
Our current newer versions are:
Frontend : "supertokens-web-js": "^0.8.0",
Backend : "supertokens-node": "^16.6.8"
r
rp_st
12/19/2023, 9:09 AMcan you send a screenshot of what you see on the supertokens.com dashboard please?
a
alen_george
12/19/2023, 9:14 AMr
rp_st
12/19/2023, 9:15 AMright ok! on it. Sorry for the confusion
rp_st
12/19/2023, 9:15 AMcan you refresh the page?
rp_st
12/19/2023, 9:16 AMit should show the right version now
a
alen_george
12/19/2023, 9:21 AMHey thanks, its showing latest version now.
alen_george
12/20/2023, 11:18 PMHi @rp_st , We have used email and thirdparty passwordless recipe. So for that earlier our code looked something like this where we had written few conditions for performing specific scenarios after getting suggestions from you.
Copy code
thirdPartySignInUpPOST: async function (input) {
try {
if (originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUpPOST) {
return await originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUpPOST(input);
}
} catch (err) {
if (err.message === "Cannot sign up as email already exists") {
return {
status: "GENERAL_ERROR",
message: "Seems like you already have an account with another method. Please use that instead."
}
}
throw err;
}
}r
rp_st
12/21/2023, 6:05 AMcan i see the override for thirdPartySignInUp in override.functions?
a
alen_george
12/21/2023, 1:36 PM Copy code
thirdPartySignInUp: async function (input) {
if (input.email) {
// let existingUsers = await ThirdPartyPasswordless.getUsersByEmail(input.email);
let existingUsers = await supertokens.listUsersByAccountInfo("public", {
email: input.email
});
if (existingUsers.length === 0) {
// this means this email is new so we allow sign up
return originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUp(input);
}
if (existingUsers.find(i => "email" in i && "thirdParty" in i && i.thirdParty.id === input.thirdPartyId && i.thirdParty.userId === input.thirdPartyUserId)) {
// this means we are trying to sign in with the same social login. So we allow it
return originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUp(input);
}
// this means that the email already exists with another social or passwordless login method, so we throw an error.
throw new Error("Cannot sign up as email already exists");
} else {
return originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUp(input);
}
}alen_george
12/21/2023, 1:36 PMThis is the thirdPartySigninUp override which we were doing earlier.
r
rp_st
12/21/2023, 1:41 PMwhich part of this is the execution coming in when you try and sign in with google?
a
alen_george
12/21/2023, 1:44 PMAll the third party apps.
r
rp_st
12/21/2023, 1:44 PMhuh?
rp_st
12/21/2023, 1:44 PMcould you tell me which part of the function the execution comes into?
a
alen_george
12/21/2023, 1:48 PMIts throwing this error :
throw new Error("Cannot sign up as email already exists");
Its not entering any of the if condition
r
rp_st
12/21/2023, 1:49 PMcould you repost the code with proper formatting?
a
alen_george
12/21/2023, 1:51 PM Copy code
thirdPartySignInUp: async function (input) {
if (input.email) {
// let existingUsers = await ThirdPartyPasswordless.getUsersByEmail(input.email);
let existingUsers = await supertokens.listUsersByAccountInfo("public", {
email: input.email
});
console.log(existingUsers);
if (existingUsers.length === 0) {
// this means this email is new so we allow sign up
return originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUp(input);
}
if (existingUsers.find(i => "email" in i && "thirdParty" in i && i.thirdParty.id === input.thirdPartyId && i.thirdParty.userId === input.thirdPartyUserId)) {
// this means we are trying to sign in with the same social login. So we allow it
return originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUp(input);
}
// this means that the email already exists with another social or passwordless login method, so we throw an error.
throw new Error("Cannot sign up as email already exists");
} else {
return originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUp(input);
}
}alen_george
12/21/2023, 1:52 PMFor existing users Im getting this log :
[
User {
id: '5022b513-ed0d-4976-81b5-05f06be62e95',
isPrimaryUser: false,
tenantIds: [ 'public' ],
emails: [ 'alen01@gmail.com' ],
phoneNumbers: [],
thirdParty: [ [Object] ],
timeJoined: 1703033843084,
loginMethods: [ [LoginMethod] ]
}
]
r
rp_st
12/21/2023, 1:52 PMcould you use three back ticks please?
rp_st
12/21/2023, 1:52 PMthis is hard for me to read
a
alen_george
12/21/2023, 1:53 PMis it good now ?
r
rp_st
12/21/2023, 1:59 PMChange the function to:
Copy code
thirdPartySignInUp: async function (input) {
let existingUsers = await supertokens.listUsersByAccountInfo(input.tenantId, {
email: input.email
});
if (existingUsers.length === 0) {
// this means this email is new so we allow sign up
return originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUp(input);
}
if (existingUsers.find(u =>
u.loginMethods.find(lM => lM.hasSameThirdPartyInfoAs({
id: input.thirdPartyId,
userId: input.thirdPartyUserId
}) && lM.recipeId === "thirdparty") !== undefined)) {
// this means we are trying to sign in with the same social login. So we allow it
return originalImplementation.thirdPartySignInUp(input);
}
// this means that the email already exists with another social or email password login method, so we throw an error.
throw new Error("Cannot sign up as email already exists");
}a
alen_george
12/21/2023, 2:06 PMThanks a lot, Iwill try this out.
alen_george
12/22/2023, 6:00 AMHey a quick question ? How can I modify the consumeCodePost for the email sign in method. Im facing same issue like thirdparty where second time if I sign in its not allowing.
alen_george
12/22/2023, 6:01 AM Copy code
createCodePOST: async function (input) {
if ("email" in input) {
let existingUsers = await supertokens.listUsersByAccountInfo("public", {
email: input.email
});
if (existingUsers.length === 0) {
// this means this email is new so we allow sign up
if (originalImplementation.createCodePOST) {
return originalImplementation.createCodePOST(input);
}
}
if (existingUsers.find(i => "email" in i && !("thirdParty" in i))) {
// this means that the existing user is a passwordless login user. So we allow it
if (originalImplementation.createCodePOST) {
return originalImplementation.createCodePOST(input);
}
}
return {
status: "GENERAL_ERROR",
message: "Seems like you already have an account with another method. Please use that instead."
}
}
}r
a
alen_george
12/22/2023, 6:01 AMThanks
alen_george
12/22/2023, 6:27 AMOne quick question, how much time would it take to upgrade the supertokens core for production ?
r
rp_st
12/22/2023, 6:59 AM1 business day.
rp_st
12/22/2023, 6:59 AMthe actual downtime would be a few seconds.
a
alen_george
12/22/2023, 2:07 PMDo we have to mail you again for the upgrade of production core?
r
rp_st
12/22/2023, 2:07 PMyup
a
alen_george
12/30/2023, 5:59 AMWe were trying to add a new tenant in development. 'Just getting this message 'EntityID already exists for different tenant/product'. Is Entity Id same as the tenant id ?
r
rp_st
12/30/2023, 5:59 AMno
rp_st
12/30/2023, 5:59 AMyou are adding this in SAML?
a
alen_george
12/30/2023, 6:00 AMIm using the mock saml metadata to test.
alen_george
12/30/2023, 6:01 AMhow to delete dev tenants if I already have created earlier?
r
rp_st
12/30/2023, 6:01 AMin boxyhq or in supertokens?
a
alen_george
12/30/2023, 6:01 AMboth side.
alen_george
12/30/2023, 6:02 AMIm getting this error while making a call to get the client id and secret 'EntityID already exists for different tenant/product'
r
rp_st
12/30/2023, 6:02 AMsee the API spec please: https://app.swaggerhub.com/apis/supertokens/CDI and also refer to boxy hq docs on their site.
a
alen_george
12/30/2023, 6:05 AMhow to solve this ? Whatever new tenant Id Im giving, Im not able to get the client id and secret. Im getting this error while making a call to get the client id and secret 'EntityID already exists for different tenant/product'. Is there any way to reset this ?
r
rp_st
12/30/2023, 6:06 AMyou should remove the existing tenant
rp_st
12/30/2023, 6:06 AMsee the docs and api spec please.
r
Raja I
12/30/2023, 11:32 AMHi we have created only one tenant, which is listed on http://localhost:8080/auth/dashboard/
public and uosc
r
rp_st
12/30/2023, 11:33 AMThis error is coming from boxyhq. Can you join their discord and ask them please?
rp_st
12/30/2023, 11:33 AMOr, if you want us to guide you, you can start a support subscription with us.
r
Raja I
12/30/2023, 11:34 AMSure. I will check with them. Can you share us the details about support subscription?
r
rp_st
12/30/2023, 11:34 AMDMing u
r
Raja I
12/30/2023, 11:40 AMSure
Raja I
01/02/2024, 7:28 AMHi @rp_st I have send you an email for production upgrade.
Raja I
01/02/2024, 7:30 AMToday we have to roll out SSO for our enterprise customer in production. Your help will be more helpful for us to implement and launch.
r
rp_st
01/02/2024, 7:56 AMDoing it now
10 Views